The First Coins Struck in The Original Thirteen Colonies: Massachusetts (‘NE’) Silver of 1652

Coin Rarities & Related Topics : News and Analysis regarding barely coins, coin markets, and the coin collecting community # 225
A CoinWeek Weekly Column by Greg Reynolds… .
The original thirteen States of the USA were colonies of Great Britain before the contract of independence in 1776. Massachusetts was one of these thirteen, though its diagnose and boundaries were different in the 1600s. In 1652, the government of the Massachusetts Bay Colony passed a law authorizing the institution of a mint to produce silver medal coins. The subject hera is the coins of the beginning design type ; ‘ NE ’ type Massachusetts silver coins were produced ‘ by hand ’ for fair a few months. ‘ NE ’ stood for New England. These were followed by Massachusetts Silver coins of other design types with intricate designs, the last of which was minted in 1682. The ‘ NE ’ type coins distinctly came beginning !
new-england-sixpence The ‘ NE ’ character Massachusetts Silver coins struck were undated ; they did not exhibit any indication as to the year in which they were made. Three denominations were authorized and struck in 1652 : Twelvepence, Sixpence and Threepence coins. Twelve penny equaled a shilling and twelvepence silver coins were normally termed shillings.

It is certain that NE character coins were struck before Willow Tree type coins at the like mint in Massachusetts. Some researchers hypothesize that Willow Tree coins were minted from 1653 to 1660 ; Oak Tree type coins were minted from 1660 to 1667 ; and Pine Tree type coins were produced from 1667 to 1682. It may be true that merely ‘ Small Size ’ Pine Tree Shillings were minted from 1675 to 1682 .
other than the soon discussed ‘ NE ’ coins, which are not dated, all Massachusetts Silver coins are dated “ 1652, ” except the Oak Tree Twopence, which are dated “ 1662. ” In May 1662, the Massachusetts government authorized Twopence coins for the first time .
While Willow Tree, Oak Tree and Pine Tree neologism had intricate designs, the NE coinage had the simplest design of any wide accepted, American or european coins of which I am aware. On the front ( obverse ), a modest share of the surface is occupied by two raised letters, NE, inside an odd shape indentation. On the back ( reverse ), a little percentage of the surface is occupied by Roman numerals indicating the face value of the respective mint in penny ( ‘ pennies ’ ) .
On both sides, the huge majority of the airfoil is equitable space metal. While these are not the most attractive of all north american english coins, they are highly rare and they have a great deal of historical meaning. besides, many toned nicely, with creamy brown, russet, and particularly blue-grey hues. In some cases, NE Shillings are much more attractive when viewed in actuality than they appear to be in publish images .
The impressions with hammers and punches that brought about the ‘ NE ’ on the obverse and the Roman numerals indicating the denomination on the reversion can be accurately referred to as ‘ stamps. ’ Researcher Christopher J. Salmon, MD, found that the “ NE and appellation stamps ” identical much like the “ touchmarks used at the time by silversmiths, reflecting the fact that John Hull and Robert Sanderson, Sr. [ directors of the Massachusetts Mint ] were the first established silversmith partnership in the british colonies and that all of their prior experience was in making flatware and hollow-ware, ” not tokens, medals or coins before 1652. “ The stamps are in the stylus of seventeenth Century touchmarks, and the coins are particularly charm and attractive when viewed in this context, ” Salmon declares .

I. First Coins of America?

obviously, NE type, Massachusetts Silver coins were minted from June to October 1652. The NE coins were subject to valid criticism soon after they were introduced. As these have minimal design elements and were struck ‘ by handwriting ’ with hammers, dishonest individuals could and did easily clip or shave the edges to obtain small amounts of eloquent. furthermore, two letters “ NE ” on the obverse ( front ) and Roman numerals on the reverse ( back ) do not reveal much about the nature and origins of these coins. Some merchants and traders were fishy of them .
The Willow Tree, Oak Tree and Pine Tree coinages featured the list of the colony and bound design elements. Although these later Massachusetts Silver coin types have more of a traditional ‘ coin appearance, ’ the NE pieces are true coins, excessively ; they are not bullion items. They are round. They were issued to circulate as money, and surely served as a medium of change. Their face value was greater than their flatware metallic ( bullion ) value. NE coins are of sizes and denominations that were coherent, familiar and practical in Massachusetts in the moment half of the seventeenth hundred. They meet all sensible criteria to qualify as coins .
baltimore It is highly likely that these NE ash grey pieces are the first coins that were struck in the british colonies in the continent of North America. Coins of the spanish Empire were first struck in Mexico in the mid-1530s .
Historians broadly agree that the coins of Lord Baltimore were not struck until 1658 or 1659 and credibly did not reach Maryland before 1660. It is very likely that all of the Lord Baltimore coinage was minted in England. even if Lord Baltimore neologism was struck in Maryland, Lord Baltimore coins could not possibly have been made before 1653 .
Coins of Bermuda pre-date the Lord Baltimore neologism that circulated in Maryland, and were struck earlier than Massachusetts Silver coins. Bermuda was then called the Sommer Islands, and these Bermuda coins were credibly struck in 1615 or 1616. A landmark group of them was just auctioned on May 16 in the sale of pre-1793 items from the Eric Newman Collection. These coins, however, were probably struck in England and brought to Bermuda ( Sommer Islands ). even if coins were struck in Bermuda during or around 1615, the “ Sommer Islands ” coins would not have much meaning in terms of the history of the United States .
Bermuda was not directly involved in the american Revolutionary War and never became part of the United States. indeed, even now, Bermuda remains part of Great Britain. In a sense, it is the last leftover british colony in North America, though it is more than six hundred miles from the Atlantic Coast .
Massachusetts, in contrast, has been very a lot a contribution of the United States ever since the nation was founded. Plus, big residents of Massachusetts, including John Adams and John Hancock, played significant roles in the american Revolution and the early years of the nation .

II. Massachusetts coins and the Civil War in England

In the 1600s, there was an acute deficit of coins in Massachusetts and business activities were harmed by circulating forge coins. A large number of fakes came from societies in the Caribbean, or from autonomous traders who obtained them at assorted locations. There were besides many incoming argent coins that had been deceptively lightened in burden, particularly cob of the spanish Empire. Boston was a major port ; the colonists were importing and exporting goods to a startle extent, even in the mid 1600s ! The decision to begin neologism in 1652, preferably then earlier, related to the Civil War in England .
englishwar The so call “ English Civil War ” very involved all of the british Isles, not just England. indeed, events in Scotland and Ireland were of big importance. This ‘ war lasted, more or less, from 1642 to 1651. Before, the function of Parliament, which is the home legislature, in the system of english politics was not well defined. The sovereign could disband Parliament at will and many influential citizens maintained that they were not reasonably represented. There were early besides early issues that lead to a lot dissatisfaction with King Charles I .
Although historians divide the English Civil War into two to four clear-cut conflicts and emphasize that diverse political factions were involved, the elementary conflict was between the Parliamentarians, who sought to increase the function of Parliament in the british politics, and the Royalists, who emphasized the pre-eminent character of the king in the government .
After King Charles I was executed in 1649 and the Royalists lost major battles, the Royalists kept fighting and were not securely defeated until belated in 1651. Charles II, the son of Charles I, had been proclaimed king by the english Royalists and by the Scottish Parliament, which declared him to be “ King of Great Britain, France and Ireland. ”
On Sept. 3, 1651, the Royalists lost the final conflict of the English Civil War, at Worcester. Charles II then began to escape, finally landing at Normandy, France, on Oct. 16, 1651. It took clock for colonists in Massachusetts to learn of these events.When there was no longer a recognized sovereign on English dirty, the colonial government of Massachusetts authorized a local batch .
generally, the permission of the relevant, reigning sovereign would have been needed for colonists to start a mint. As the theme of allowing colonists to strike their own coins was rarely tied a consideration, colonists credibly figured that there was normally no charge in even asking. In Europe, the strike of gold or silver coins was associated with the concepts of sovereignty and legitimacy. Monarchs typically figured that it was inappropriate, threaten, and/or costly to the ‘ mother area, ’ for colonies to produce their own gold or silver coins. The absence of a monarch, however, was an atypical situation .
From 1649 to 1653, the Parliamentarians were struggling to efficaciously operate the Parliament and to govern England. There was a lot disagreement among themselves. furthermore, their forces were inactive battling Royalists and other opponents of the raw government, “ The Commonwealth. ” The Parliamentarians were therefore not particularly concerned about whether colonists in Massachusetts struck coins. indeed, they probably did not tied think about this subject .
The “ Commonwealth ” was governed by a legislature ( Parliament ). On April 20, 1653, forces led by Oliver Cromwell forcibly dissolved this Parliament. Another new system of politics was implemented in 1653 and 1654 that established Cromwell himself as the domineering ‘ head of state. ’ Cromwell was not identical concerned about the affairs of the colonies .
rather than ask Cromwell for license to mint coins, which would have been an awkward request, the colonists in Massachusetts good continued to mint coins. They decided to continue to go steady all of them “ 1652. ”
In a fabled reference book book, which was published in 1875, Sylvester Crosby declares that there were no objections to the mint of coins in Massachusetts by the English “ Parliament or by Cromwell ; and having been thus indulged, there was a silent allowance of it afterwards, evening by King Charles II, for more than twenty dollar bill years. ” Crosby adds that, the mint of coins in Massachusetts “ was made one of the charges against the colony when the [ Massachusetts ] rent was called in question, so far no capital stress was laid upon ” this subject by the english government ( Crosby, 1875, p. 32 ) .
The government of England became disconnected after Cromwell ’ s death in 1658. In 1660, Charles II returned and was proclaimed king without fantastic controversy. There was then a consensus, among influential political factions, that a king was needed and Charles II then had much support.
By the early 1680s, relations between the government of Massachusetts and the administration of King Charles II had worsened well. sol, “ on October 23, 1684 Charles II abolished the charter of Massachusetts [ Colony ], invalidating all of the laws of [ Massachusetts ] including the mint act of 1652, ” historian Louis Jordan emphasizes .

III. Threepence

good one NE Threepence is presently known. “ To my cognition, the NE Threepence is alone, ” John Kraljevich states. It has been in the collection of the Massachusetts Historical Society for many decades. Dr. Salmon remarks that he “ does not know of any others ” and has not heard credible rumors of another NE Threepence surviving. Christopher Salmon has written academic articles about Massachusetts Silver coins and his book on this subject was published by the ANS in 2010. salmon does not receive any proceeds from sales of his ledger.
individually, a ‘ Northeast Collector. ’ who has a comprehensive collection of Massachusetts Silver, has “ not heard of another Threepence existing during the last thirty years. ” There were, though, reports in the past of extra NE Threepence coins surviving. sol, another actual piece could be round. Forgeries have surfaced, particularly in Great Britain .

IV. Sixpence

In the late catalogue of Eric Newman ’ s pre-1793 items, researchers at Heritage itemize seven NE Sixpence coins, all of which were struck from one copulate of dies. There are non-genuine pieces struck from other pairs of dies .
The most celebrated NE Sixpence is the alleged ‘ Potato Field ’ coin. It was in the Jack Royse Collection and was auctioned by Stack ’ s-Bowers in Nov. 2012 for $ 431,250. Earlier, in Nov. 1991, Sotheby ’ south auctioned it for $ 35,200. obviously, it was unearthed with a alloy detector by Lillian Rade in a Long Island potato plain during the winter of 1990. For many decades, Long Island was known for significant potato farms .
The already cited ‘ Northeast Collector ’ contacted Rade and interviewed her. This collector, who prefers that his name not be mentioned, says that “ there is no doubt her narrative was true. ” He had been researching the historical and circumstantial aspects of Massachusetts Silver and early colonial coins for a very hanker time. I have known this ‘ Northeast Collector ’ for more than twenty years.

Royse-Potato-Sixpence For a non-gradable piece, the Royse-Rade-Potato Sixpence is slightly pleasant. Though obviously better, the Newman NE Sixpence has batch of hairlines and a few light scratches. John Kraljevich agrees and he notes that some of the scratches “ did not come from convention circulation, but from mishandling when it was owned ” as a collectible or keepsake .
The Newman Sixpence besides has some very noticeable clothing. I am puzzled by the put “ AU-58 ” grade. I figure that it has the pungency of an AU-53 grade and a few scratches bring its net grade down to “ 50. ” even so, 50 is a gamey mark for a mint from this era and the Newman NE Sixpence is impressive for an early colonial mint .
Dr. Salmon suggests that the Newman Sixpence is not the finest known. “ The Roper NE Sixpence is a dramatic coin, better than the Newman coin, ” states Salmon. Chris carefully examined the Roper NE Sixpence a few years ago. Stack ’ sulfur auctioned the collection of John Roper in New York in 1983 .
John Kraljevich remarks that the $ 646,250 resultant role for the Newman Sixpence “ is in channel with what was expected. Though the NE Sixpence are much rare, collectors tend to prefer NE Shillings, like they prefer Lord Baltimore Shillings to Sixpence. ” In accession to being a noted research worker, Kraljevich is a dealer in colonial and early early american items .
Andy Lustig figures that the NE Sixpence “ could well have sold for more, though it was not cheap, not a bargain. ” Lustig has been bidding on major rarities at coin auctions since the 1970s and he has owned many important pre-1793 american items .

V. NE Shillings

Twelvepence coins are Shillings. Expert estimates of the number of NE Shilling that exist range from forty to seventy-five. I suggest that there are around fifty-five. It is known that more than twenty are in museums or other institutional holdings .
curiously, very few have appeared at auction over the last nine years. I can now account for seven different pieces .
A. Sundman-Newcomer-Boyd-Ford SBG 11/13 $440,625
In Nov. 2013, Stack ’ s-Bowers auctioned David Sundman ’ s collection. He is possibly beneficial known as CEO and star of Littleton Coin Company of New Hampshire. The $ 440,625 result is an auction record for an NE Shilling. This like coin brought $ 253,000 in Oct. 2005 .
B. Manley-Boyd-Ford-Madison HA 08/10 $416,875.00
In Aug. 2010, Heritage auctioned Dwight Manley ’ s collection of Massachusetts Silver at the ANA Convention in Boston, an appropriate placement. This musical composition is PCGS graded “ AU-50 ” and has a poser of approval from the CAC .
In Oct. 2005, Stack ’ second ( New York ) auctioned this same item for $ 322,000, and Heritage sold it for $ 373,750 in Orlando on Jan. 10, 2008. It was then region of the Madison Collection .
The pre-2005 lineage of this piece that was listed in 2005 does not seem to include a anterior auction appearances, a particular private sale, or a mention of pictures of this nibble being published in a character employment. be pictures of this piece published before 2005 ?
C. Roach-Picker-Hain Stack’s 05/07 $414,000
This coin was auctioned by Stack ’ second in Jan. 2002 for $ 161,000, as bunch # 2 in the sale of Andy Hain ’ s solicitation. It was again auctioned by Stack ’ s in May 2007, for $ 414,000. It was catalogued as grading “ highly Fine ” in the 2002 sale and as “ EF-40 ” for the 2007 sale .
In 2008, the firm that bought it in 2007 sold it privately to Denis Loring and Donna Levin, who still own it. In 2007 or early 2008, it was PCGS graded as “ AU-50. ”
D. Unknown Origin SBG 01/13 $352,500
This objet d’art was consigned by a british principal to a Stack ’ s-Bowers auction in New York. A generator indicates that the consigner did not consign any early items to this sale and did not reveal who provided this assemble to him. It is PCGS graded “ EF-40 ” and has a CAC dagger .
E. Eric Newman HA 05/16/14 $352,500
The NE Shilling that was in the Eric Newman Collection is NGC graded as AU-55. “ Frankly, I was surprised at the [ certified ] grade of Newman ’ s ” NE Shilling, declares Denis Loring. He and I are storm that it was certified at grading above 50 .
This Shilling has actually please tone. Medium brown-russet blends well with the typical natural blue-grey ‘ movie ’ that I have seen on respective NE Shillings and on the Newman NE Sixpence.
The Newman NE Shilling is much more attractive when it is held in actuality than it appears to be in the catalog. even thus, the planchet ( disposed blank that was used to produce this mint ) was very petroleum. There are inconsistencies in the metal and a lot natural roughness. While the Newman NE Shilling has more attractive discolor than the Newman NE Sixpence, the order of magnitude of the mint-caused imperfections of this shilling is noteworthy .
Andy Lustig “ would quite have an NE Shilling that was better made, with a smooth planchet, one that has better rims. It brought less because it was more crudely made ” than many of the other surviving NE Shillings, Lustig suggests .
If it is determined that this coin has the sharpness of an AU-50 and its net grade is EF-45 at best, ascribable to mint-caused imperfections and scratches, then the $ 352,500 result is a mince price, not a weak price.
I like this coin more than Lustig does. To me, it has more personality and color than a few of the other NE Shillings that I have seen. I much prefer it to the barely mentioned piece of unknown pedigree and I like this coin more than the Manley-Boyd-Madison piece, which has irregularities, excessively .
As Dr. Salmon points out, NE Shillings “ can not be fairly evaluated in the ways 19th century silver coins are judged. The circumstances of their mint and their historic context must be considered. ”
F. Hall-Wurtzbach-Clarke-Boyd-Ford Stack’s 10/05:2 $345,000
This is one of four that Stack ’ mho auctioned in Oct. 2005. Two have already been listed here. It was then catalogued as “ Choice Very Fine. ”

G. Newcomer-Clarke-Boyd-Ford Stack’s 10/05:4 $276,000
This patch was graded “ Extremely Fine ” in 2005 by the cataloger for Stack ’ mho and belated PCGS graded “ AU-50. ” It was offered by John Agre and Dave Wnuck in 2009 for “ $ 335,000 ” and is still pictured on the CRO web site.
Have any other NE Shillings been offered at auction since 2005 ?
©2014 Greg Reynolds

reference :
Category : Finance

Post navigation

Leave a Comment

Trả lời

Email của bạn sẽ không được hiển thị công khai.